MU Coffee Questions Grow
Written by Brian on August 22, 2006 – 12:35 am - Welcome, if you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed or subscribe to our email newsletter. Thanks for visiting!
As GOP3 and the Professor McAdams have written about, some questions surround Marquette University’s coffee provider switch from Alterra to Stone Creek. According to McAdams, Marquette was coerced into changing by a donating alumnus who threatened to withdraw his donations if Marquette did not change to his son’s coffee company, Stone Creek.
Daniel Suhr discovered this clip from the Milwaukee Business Journal from August 11th and sent it around earlier today to a few people:
Marketing director leaves Stone Creek for Marquette University
Stone Creek Coffee Roasters’ marketing and technology director, Tom Pionek, has left the specialty coffee maker to take a position with Marquette University as a senior web marketing strategist in the marketing and communications department.
An employee of Stone Creek, thus, now works for Marquette University.
Was Marquette coerced into highering one or more employees of Stone Creek out of necessity to maintain donor relations, as well?
We also recieved a phone call tonight from an individual who is training at Orientation Staff this week in preparation for Freshman Move-in and the like. This individual informed us that the creator of Stone Creek Coffee, one Eric Resch, spoke to Orientation leaders and directly provided his product to Orientation Staff members.
After googling Stone Creek, we also found a blog of sorts, which included the following in an entry for earlier this evening, August 22nd:
Coffee and Square Dancing at MU - Aug 22 2006
Posted by: Eric ReschThis evening I had a chance to meet a couple hundred student leaders atMarquette University. Beginning this past week Stone Creek Coffee is now being brewed at all Brew locations on campus. I had a chance to talk to the Orientation Leaders about Stone Creek’s Community Coffee programs, the history of Stone Creek and our plans to work together to create service opportunities. I served Stone Creek at 9 PM worried that I would have few takers for caffeinated coffee. I did not realize my coffee talk was sandwiched between square dance training and a customer service training module. They planned to go until midnight and had no trouble drinking all my coffee. I am looking forward to working with everyone at MU. Doe-Se-Doe, I’m off to bed. Eric
It seems that Stone Creek has been given greater access to the Marquette community than one might have previously realized.
Now, Mr. Resch might be a fine fellow. So might his coercing old man who demanded the change. (Well, maybe.)
However, I can’t escape a few troubling questions that we haven’t heard answers for yet regarding this ordeal.
Why did Marquette University trump up the “social justice” ideals of Stone Creek when Alterra shares an identical viewpoint? Why are hiring policies at Marquette now based on connections with vendors, these same vendors existing at MU as a result of donor relations? How many other decisions at Marquette chosen on the basis of so-called “social justice” concerns are really empty air meant to conceal fishy business practices?
I also cannot escape the real analogies to socialism that this feigned social justice hypocrisy represents. Liberals believe that in lieu of market driven forces at the hands of a body of consumers, all-knowing elites should be in command of which companies or particular constituencies thrive.
Given the opportunity to put their own people in command over an economy, or in this case a single university, such an entity can expect a working relationship between the governing entity and the company which operates as a monopoly.
The result of this relationship is the exchange of people and finances that facilitates the continuity of that relationship and not necessarily the delivery of those products which would exist if market driven forces, and not a monopoly, were in place.
Because the governing entity, in this case a university, is uncomfortable with the real reasons behind its financial decisions, it has to sound out faux reasons such as feel-good social justice concerns.
The analogy is far from perfect, though given that universities in free countries still operate with some market forces, but is close enough to demonstrate the ill-formed basis of such business practices.
Last 5 posts by Brian- Simon Harak's September 2003 Speech at Marquette -- And My Official Introduction to Jesuits - June 12th, 2008
- "How Al Gore is Getting Fat off of a Starving World" - June 1st, 2008
- Best column I've read so far on Scott McClellan - May 31st, 2008
- So in other words, you have no leads or suspects at this time? - May 30th, 2008
- RITA GAHAGAN - May 24th, 2008
Posted in Marquette Golden Chickens |












August 22nd, 2006 at 10:13 am
They still serve Alterra coffee at Ruby G’s on the corner of 21st and Wells. 10% discount to college students all the time and half off everything on sundays. They often have really good live bands, and the food is great (Try the brownies).
August 22nd, 2006 at 10:14 am
Maybe, Jesus told Marquette to use Stone Creek. Maybe, the University decided to patron a business of an alumn. Maybe, whoever makes the decision is sleeping with the owner’s daughter. The better question is, “who cares?”
August 22nd, 2006 at 10:18 am
John,
Some people, yours truly included, would like to know where their tuition dollars are going and in what manner they are used, and whether this or any other bizarre action of MU is par for the course or an anomolie.
By the way, I don’t drink coffee.
Brian
August 22nd, 2006 at 11:01 am
This is disappointing news, aside from the alleged backroom coercion of the deal. Stone Creek Coffee is just plain bad coffee. They over-roast their coffee and it is rarely fresh. Who knows how long the coffee sits in those large glass jars in their shops? I am not a blinded fan of Alterra either–they are only a B grade cafe on the scale of national micro-roasters in the US–nevertheless they are at least a solid roaster and without a doubt better than Stone Creek. I guess this means I will need to think of creative ways to use my hand-grinder and press-pot while on campus.
August 22nd, 2006 at 11:24 am
Let’s just say I’m glad I got a one-cup Keurig brewer as a gift…at least I’ll have decent, not overpriced coffee to drink this year without going far downtown.
August 22nd, 2006 at 2:58 pm
Maybe this is just a case of a business owner busting his @ss to get MU’s business?!
Or maybe there really was a second shooter - in the grassy knoll..
August 22nd, 2006 at 3:12 pm
Frank,
That has already been answered.
MU chose this business owner due to familial donor relations and not the competency of the organization.
Brian
August 22nd, 2006 at 5:14 pm
Brian, remember tuition dollars don’t cover all expenses and the University needs guys who have kids who own coffee companies.
August 22nd, 2006 at 10:28 pm
Brian Says:
August 22nd, 2006 at 3:12 pm
Frank,
That has already been answered.
MU chose this business owner due to familial donor relations and not the competency of the organization.
Brian
Prove it - until then I say B.S.
August 23rd, 2006 at 8:36 am
Frank,
The Administration’s claim that the reason for the change is out of “social justice” concerns has been proven to be bogus given that Alterra shares the same ideology. Marquette has refused to respond to claims on GOP3 and the Warrior blog about this issue. That silence speaks volumes.
Do you have proof that it was not? Who are you? Some Stone Creek stooge? Unless MU tells us the real reason behind the switch, this is going to be the presumed answer.
Brian
August 23rd, 2006 at 10:27 am
I heard the Pope told Marquette to change coffee suppliers.
If Marquette wants to use a company of an alumn of the University more power to them.
February 24th, 2007 at 12:41 pm
[...] Suhr of GOP3.com and further investigated by Dr. McAdams, about Marquette’s decision to change vendors from Altera to Stone Creek on the basis of donor threats by the father of a locally-owned coffee [...]