<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Ballot Today, My Predictions for Tonight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gop3.com/2006/09/12/my-ballot-today-my-predictions-for-tonight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gop3.com/2006/09/12/my-ballot-today-my-predictions-for-tonight/</link>
	<description>Fighting Like Warriors and Thinking Right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:30:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Chapman</title>
		<link>http://gop3.com/2006/09/12/my-ballot-today-my-predictions-for-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-25488</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gop3.com/?p=609#comment-25488</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re taking an argument farther than it can logically be supported, annie. Just because the constitution doesn&#039;t guarantee a &quot;right to privacy&quot; doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s damaging to the constitution to support privacy rights in general.

If sobriety checkpoints are unconstitutional (I haven&#039;t researched it, but I think they&#039;ve been upheld) it would be because they violate the 4th amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches, not because of the privacy penumbras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re taking an argument farther than it can logically be supported, annie. Just because the constitution doesn&#8217;t guarantee a &#8220;right to privacy&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s damaging to the constitution to support privacy rights in general.</p>
<p>If sobriety checkpoints are unconstitutional (I haven&#8217;t researched it, but I think they&#8217;ve been upheld) it would be because they violate the 4th amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches, not because of the privacy penumbras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://gop3.com/2006/09/12/my-ballot-today-my-predictions-for-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-25347</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 04:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gop3.com/?p=609#comment-25347</guid>
		<description>I will now eat humble pie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will now eat humble pie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://gop3.com/2006/09/12/my-ballot-today-my-predictions-for-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-25301</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gop3.com/?p=609#comment-25301</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s fair to say J.B. is &quot;more conservative&quot; becaue he is opposed to drunk driving check points. Endorsing privacy rights, insofar as this issue is concerned, is hardly conserving the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s fair to say J.B. is &#8220;more conservative&#8221; becaue he is opposed to drunk driving check points. Endorsing privacy rights, insofar as this issue is concerned, is hardly conserving the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://gop3.com/2006/09/12/my-ballot-today-my-predictions-for-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-25244</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gop3.com/?p=609#comment-25244</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be surprised if Wall cracks 15%.  Nusbaum&#039;s got hella name recognition, I think she&#039;ll do better than you predict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be surprised if Wall cracks 15%.  Nusbaum&#8217;s got hella name recognition, I think she&#8217;ll do better than you predict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Herron</title>
		<link>http://gop3.com/2006/09/12/my-ballot-today-my-predictions-for-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-25243</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Herron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gop3.com/?p=609#comment-25243</guid>
		<description>Daniel - Kudos to you, i am however a bit disappointed that you didn&#039;t pick a winner in the OZ Co. Clerk race - it&#039;s getting pretty heated...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel &#8211; Kudos to you, i am however a bit disappointed that you didn&#8217;t pick a winner in the OZ Co. Clerk race &#8211; it&#8217;s getting pretty heated&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Henak</title>
		<link>http://gop3.com/2006/09/12/my-ballot-today-my-predictions-for-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-25240</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Henak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gop3.com/?p=609#comment-25240</guid>
		<description>Great post Daniel!  Love the CS Lewis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Daniel!  Love the CS Lewis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
